ANTARA HUKUM DAN KEKERASAN: EVALUASI EFEKTIVITAS HUKUM HUMANITER INTERNASIONAL DALAM MELINDUNGI SIPIL PALESTINA

Authors

  • Davy Darma Putra Sekolah Staf dan Komando Tentara Nasional Indonesia
  • Arif Rahman Sekolah Staf dan Komando Tentara Nasional Indonesia
  • Tarsisius Susilo Sekolah Staf dan Komando Tentara Nasional Indonesia
  • Agustinus Adi Santoso Sekolah Staf dan Komando Tentara Nasional Indonesia
  • Muhammad Taufik Zega Sekolah Staf dan Komando Tentara Nasional Indonesia

Keywords:

International Humanitarian Law, Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Civilian Protection, Human Rights Violations, Impunity, International Law Enforcement, Distinction and Proportionality Principles, International Institutions, Humanitarian Crisis, Global Response

Abstract

The prolonged conflict between Israel and Palestine has become one of the most complex testing grounds for the application of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), particularly in terms of the protection of civilians. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of IHL implementation in the context of this conflict, as well as to identify factors that contribute to violations of the law, impunity, and weak protection for Palestinian civilians. This study also aims to describe how international institutions respond to these violations and the extent to which these responses are able to meet the basic principles of humanitarian law. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with methods of literature review and analysis of international legal documents, reports from humanitarian organisations, UN resolutions, and field data from independent institutions such as Human Rights Watch and the ICRC. The data is analysed using a normative and empirical approach to evaluate the compatibility between legal norms and their implementation in the field. Key findings show that although the humanitarian legal framework clearly regulates the protection of civilians, the reality shows systematic violations of the principles of distinction, proportionality, and precaution by both sides, with the greatest impact felt by Palestinian civilians. In addition, this study found that international institutions are often unable to take effective action due to global political pressure and the use of veto power in the UN Security Council. Power imbalances and media dominance further exacerbate bias in law enforcement. The conclusion of this study confirms that the existence of IHL, despite its strong normative basis, remains very weak in its implementation if not accompanied by independent enforcement mechanisms that are free from political interests. Therefore, reforms are needed in the structure of international law enforcement, strengthening the role of civil society, and public education on the principles of humanitarian law to create more equitable and effective civilian protection in modern armed conflicts.

References

Akande, D., & Gillard, E.-C. (2020). Proportionality and precaution in the conduct of hostilities. Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law and Armed Conflict.

Amnesty International. (2021, May). Israel/OPT: Hamas rocket attacks amount to war crimes [Press release]. https://www.amnesty.org

Amnesty International. (2022). Israel’s apartheid against Palestinians: Cruel system of domination and crime against humanity. https://www.amnesty.org

Birzeit University Legal Review. (2023). Justice denied: Structural bias in international accountability mechanisms for Palestine. Birzeit University Legal Review, 12(2), 113–139.

Cassese, A. (2005). International law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Cassese, A. (2013). International criminal law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Human Rights Watch. (2021, March). Israel/Palestine: ICC has mandate over Gaza war crimes. https://www.hrw.org

Hutchinson, T. (2007). Doctrinal research: Researching the jury. In M. McConville & W. H. Chui (Eds.), Research methods in law (pp. 7–33). Routledge.

International Committee of the Red Cross. (1977). Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and Additional Protocols. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org

International Committee of the Red Cross. (2004). What is international humanitarian law? Advisory Service. https://www.icrc.org

International Committee of the Red Cross. (2005). Customary international humanitarian law: Volume I. Rules (J.-M. Henckaerts & L. Doswald-Beck, Eds.). Cambridge University Press.

International Committee of the Red Cross. (2005). Rule 1: The principle of distinction. In Customary international humanitarian law. Cambridge University Press.

International Committee of the Red Cross. (2005). Rule 15: Precautions in attack. In Customary international humanitarian law. Cambridge University Press.

International Criminal Court. (2021). Situation in the State of Palestine [Office of the Prosecutor]. https://www.icc-cpi.int

International Review of the Red Cross. (2021). Legality and legitimacy in modern conflict: Reframing the debate. International Review of the Red Cross, 103(917), 25–52. https://international-review.icrc.org

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mégret, F. (2002). The politics of international criminal justice. European Journal of International Law, 13(5), 1261–1284. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/13.5.1261

Michael N. Schmitt. (2002). The principle of proportionality in the law of armed conflict. Yale Journal of International Law, 27(1), 125–197.

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, United Nations, 17 July 1998. https://www.icc-cpi.int

UN News. (2021, May). UN decries Israeli strike on media building in Gaza. https://news.un.org

United Nations Human Rights Council. (2022). Report of the independent international commission of inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory. https://www.ohchr.org

United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2024, April). Hostilities in the Gaza Strip and Israel – Reported casualties and damage [Situation report]. https://www.unocha.org

Walzer, M. (2006). Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations (4th ed.). Basic Books.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-11

Issue

Section

Articles